New experts claimed the test-retest reliability as: R

Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stage peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: «Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body»; «What do you wish you looked like?»; «What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?»; «What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?» Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. _tt= 0.82 («actual»); R_tt= 0.77 («ideal»); R_tt= 0.71 («attractive»); and those of convergent validity as: R_cit= 0.73 («actual» and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).

Weight reduction restraint are mentioned from the Weight-loss Measure of Food Thinking Decide to try (EAT) (Gather, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), comprised of sixteen statements obtained towards the a six-area measure (never = 0/usually = 5), having high results demonstrating an advanced away from restrained dinner. For the Eat psychometrical features come across Garner mais aussi al. (1982). Brand new structure coefficient for products, the fresh new North american country and German ones, try of the identical really worth, an alpha away from 0.76.

Fat loss discipline

Ineffectiveness level. The latest bad apply at factor are estimated from Ineffectiveness Measure off this new Dinner Issues List (EDI) (Garner mais aussi al., 1983), that has shown a convergent validity (ineffectiveness/self-confidence ) from Roentgen = 0.70 (p

Scientific team got the weight and you may peak methods

Body mass index (BMI). Bmi are calculated because weight during the kilograms separated because of the top inside the rectangular yards (Bmi = kg/m2).

Ahead of investigation range, a great pilot study of the newest Silhouettes Size (Figure step one), placed on an example comprising 20 North american country students, was used to test the brand new appropriateness of one’s numbers in order to depict human anatomy types, to validate a acceptation of an unidentified selection of silhouettes and an obvious knowledge of the new recommendations (new German group already mentioned which have research within this regard). The outcome presented the newest Shape Scale is an effective or an suitable means to your Mexican test.

Brand new detectives of these two regions, on Mexico Urban area and also at Hae (standardized) processes. The brand new questionnaires were put on sets of medical and medical children at Mexican and you may German universities. A primary reason at the rear of the fresh ples off students pertaining to treatments was only the notice you to definitely (one can possibly imagine) this type of teenagers must have for the medical industry as well as health issues, leading them to a whole lot more tuned in to trouble eg ED. Told agree was taken from all the studies members. The contacted pupils provided to engage. The particular regional integrity committees acknowledged the fresh low-invasive processes. Elite translators undertook and you may managed the latest interpretation and you can retranslation of your own products.

Age. The mean age of Mexican women (M_age = 20.4, _SD = 0.49) https://internationalwomen.net/es/mujeres-bogota/ and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for