These countries in person prosecute prostitutes/sex specialists, exactly who to go a criminal offense

This 1999 laws had two significant requires: cutting prostitution (temporarily by the policing they and in brand new a lot of time label because of the modifying personal attitudes with the it) and cutting individual trafficking for sexual intentions (Holmstrom Skilbrei, 2017)

A second categorization scheme distinguishes among criminalization, legalization (or regulation), and decriminalization. The first category can be divided into “criminalization of the client” and “criminalization of the seller” (Ostergen, 2017). A third typology, with four categories, comes from Garotalo Geymonat (2014): criminalization (or prohibition), regulation (or legalization), abolitionism, and decriminalization. With criminalization, a state completely outlaws the exchange of sex for money. Criminalization may apply to workers or to clients, as in Sweden. With controls, the state recognizes prostitution/sex work (only among adults and without any restrictions) and regulates the sexual activities. With abolitionism, prostitution/sex work is not illegal per se, but certain activities are declared illegal and banned, such as trafficking and third- party gain (as in brothels and pimping). Decriminalization, the newest category, has been occurring only since 2003, when New Zealand became the first country to adopt this policy. In New Zealand there is no specific law on sex work, and selling sex and sexual services is equal to any other economic activity. Danna (2014) has suggested two additional categories: neo-prohibi- tionism (the criminalization of the client) and neo-regulationism (non-punitive toward sellers).

The Swedish Sex Purchase Act was first presented as part of the Womens Peace Bill. Its purpose was “to combat prostitution, which was seen as harmful, both for those directly involved and for society at large” (Holmstrom Skilbrei, 2017, p. 83). To accomplish these goals, the law criminalized the clients ot prostitutes (as we know, the law does not use the term sex gurus). These clients, who commit a criminal offence, are punished with a fine and in theory even with prison (in 2011, the prison sentence increased from 6 months to 12 months), but only 200 cases are reported each year, and of these only 10% end in a fine or imprisonment (Garofalo Geymonat, 2014). Nonetheless, many other countries, including Norway, Iceland, France, and Ireland, have adopted the “Swedish model.”

Considering Jonsson and you will Jakobsson (2017), there is a higher rate away from social anticipate to own pros- titution/sex work with countries in which prostitution/sex efforts are court and you can/or regulated than in nations in which it is illegal or criminalized

Twenty years later, we can ask: Did the Swedish Sex Purchase Operate reach their specifications? Predicated on Holmstrom and you will Skilbrei (2017), it’s very hard to influence the consequences, or no, of Swedish law inside the Sweden. Very first, let us look at brand new https://orhidi.com/en/s/models/it-emilia-romagna/parma law’s earliest mission: the newest reduction of prostitution. Based on Kotsadam and Jakobsson (2014), prostitution is more common where it is courtroom (as in Denmark) and less prominent in which it is unlawful (as with Sweden). But not, “visibility” constantly refers to highway prostitution. Just like the 1999, what amount of female (and you can guys) which sell sex in the street from inside the Sweden possess decreased somewhat, but it’s extremely difficult to say a comparable about on the internet prostitution. This new law’s next objective were to change society’s views into prostitution.

Hence, we can ending you to definitely “the newest Sex Get Work keeps contributed to improved help throughout the [Swedish] society getting forbidding not just buying sex in addition to offering sexual services” (Svedin, Jonsson, Kjellgren, Priebe, Akerman, 2012, p. 33). This basically means, it seems that the fresh new Swedish population not simply strongly prefers their laws plus thinks the rules should criminalize the latest vendors. However, which belief performs against the fundamental intentions of the regulations, and therefore is designed to cover this new victims (the fresh new sellers) and criminalize the purchasers (Holmstrom Skilbrei, 2017).